The advanced world conducts all manners of research, most times to
confirm a pre-determined belief or mindset. Worse still, there are
hardly global monitors to validate either the process or the outcome of
such researches. One of such researches has been conducted with Nigeria
as one of the countries focused on. And the result, expectedly, is a
damning verdict on Nigeria. The country is known for many things, some
good and admittedly, some bad. In recent times, there have been a number
of research reports completed by international organisations and the
results have not been favourable to Nigeria.
In October 2012, the African Insurance Organisation ranked Nigeria as
the “Kidnap-for-Ransom Capital of the World,” accounting for 25 per cent
of global kidnappings. Somalia, which had been in the business of sea
piracy and kidnappings long before Nigeria joined the 'league', has long
been overtaken by Nigeria according to the rating. In June 2012, the
Global Peace Index ranked Nigeria as the sixth most dangerous African
country to live in.
Each time such results are released, it is usually followed by debates on various online platforms with many questioning the authenticity of the results.
Each time such results are released, it is usually followed by debates on various online platforms with many questioning the authenticity of the results.
Yesterday, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), a sister company of
The Economist magazine, released results of its 2013 Where-to-be-born
Index. This time, Nigeria is ranked as No. 80 out of the 80 countries
assessed, making it the worst country to be born in among the countries
analysed. Put differently, Nigeria is the least or even the last place
the sampled respondents would want to be born.
In the “Where-To-Be-Born Index” 2013, Nigeria has the lowest score of 4.74 points, placing her at the 80th position. The index ranks Switzerland as the best country to be born in with 8.22 points. The United States and Germany tie in the 16th position with 7.38 points.
In the “Where-To-Be-Born Index” 2013, Nigeria has the lowest score of 4.74 points, placing her at the 80th position. The index ranks Switzerland as the best country to be born in with 8.22 points. The United States and Germany tie in the 16th position with 7.38 points.
Despite their strong economies, none of the BRIC countries (Brazil,
Russia, India and China) scores impressively. Among the African
countries on the list, South Africa, which was ranked 53 on the list,
comes first with 5.89 points followed by Algeria in the 54th position
and with 5.86 points.
Nigeria is the worst place for a baby to enter the world in 2013, says the survey.
Nigeria is the worst place for a baby to enter the world in 2013, says the survey.
According to the EIU, the research “earnestly attempts to measure which
country will provide the best opportunities for a healthy, safe and
prosperous life in the years ahead”.
Its quality-of-life index links the results of subjective life-satisfaction surveys—how happy people say they are—to objective determinants of the quality of life across countries. Being rich helps more than anything else, but it is not all that counts; things like crime, trust in public institutions and the health of family life matter too.
Its quality-of-life index links the results of subjective life-satisfaction surveys—how happy people say they are—to objective determinants of the quality of life across countries. Being rich helps more than anything else, but it is not all that counts; things like crime, trust in public institutions and the health of family life matter too.
In all, the index takes 11 statistically significant indicators into
account. They are a mixed bunch: some are fixed factors, such as
geography; others change only very slowly over time (demography, many
social and cultural characteristics); and some factors depend on
policies and the state of the world economy. All things considered, the
socio-economic condition of a country helps to determine how satisfied
or hopeful a people can be.
While the validity of the research may be a subject of intense debate
among stakeholders, many believe they should serve as wake-up calls for
the nation's leaders. Those who so believe argue that while the ratings
may not be accurate readings of the Nigerian polity, they indeed serve
as rough projections of the feelings of the Nigerians
No comments:
Post a Comment